Expert English language researchers at Georgia State University have compared IELTS Academic and Duolingo English Test (DET). Download the full research report or read our article for a recap.
Listening |
Test items elicit the following skills:
|
Test items elicit the following skills:
|
Summary: listening appears to be the most under-represented of all the skills in DET, compared with IELTS. DET appears to be based solely on intensive listening for vocabulary and grammatical structures, rather than listening for meaning or to understand the gist of extended discourse, which are essential skills for academic success. |
||
Reading |
Test items elicit the following skills:
|
Test items elicit the following skills:
|
Summary: a detailed comparison between the IELTS Academic Reading and the DET Reading section reveals that DET assesses a much narrower range of reading purposes and cognitive processes. |
||
Writing |
Task description
|
Task description
|
Summary: to our knowledge, Duolingo does not provide examples of scripts from any of the Writing tasks, so it is impossible to provide comparative data. However, given the general nature of the prompts and the brevity of expected responses (at least 50 words, maximum of five minutes) it would be surprising to find similar levels of lexical and syntactic complexity, or a variety of cohesive devices, in DET written responses. |
||
Speaking |
Test items elicit the following skills:
|
Test items elicit the following skills:
|
Summary: while both tests require spoken production and invoke at some level the skills involved in monologue speaking, they are not at all equivalent in terms of spoken interaction. In DET, there is no opportunity to demonstrate the ability to interact with another speaker in real time. |
Listening skills invoked in responding to test items |
||
Input decoding |
Yes | Yes |
Lexical search |
Yes | Yes |
Parsing |
Yes | Yes |
Meaning construction |
Yes | |
Reading skills invoked in responding to test items |
||
Word recognition |
Yes 2 | Yes |
Lexical access |
Yes3 |
Yes |
Syntactic parsing |
Yes4 |
Yes |
Establishing propositional meaning |
Yes |
|
Inferencing |
Yes |
|
Building a mental model |
Yes |
|
Creating a text-level representation |
Yes |
|
Reading goals | ||
Careful reading: Local | Yes | Yes |
Careful reading: Global | Yes | |
Expeditious reading: Local |
Yes | |
Expeditious reading: Global |
Yes | |
Writing skills invoked in responding to test items |
||
Microplanning |
Yes | Yes |
Translation |
Yes | Yes |
Monitoring |
Yes | Yes |
Macroplanning |
Yes | |
Organization |
Yes | |
Revising |
Yes | |
Speaking skills invoked in responding to test items | ||
Grammatical encoding |
Yes | Yes |
Morpho-phonological encoding |
Yes | Yes |
Phonetic encoding |
Yes | Yes |
Articulation |
Yes | 5 |
Conceptualization |
Yes | |
Self-monitoring |
Yes | |
Speaking interaction pattern |
||
Planning time allowed |
Yes | Yes |
Reciprocal interaction (face-to-face) |
Yes | |
Sustained speaking on a topic for more than 30 seconds |
Yes |
2Skills in parenthesis are not directly tested, but are enabling skills to complete other reading tasks.